HAYKEL

People v. HAYKEL

Good Law
116 Cal. Rptr. 2d 667·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 1594·2002 Daily Journal DAR 1821·96 Cal. App. 4th 146·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1499
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 2002G028079California1,614 words

Opinion

Opinion

O'Leary, J.

In this case we hold that because assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury is not listed as a serious felony under Penal Code section 1192.7, subdivision (c), a conviction for that crime may not be counted as a strike under the “Three Strikes” law. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resentencing.

Frederick Henry Haykel was charged with two felony counts of possession of a controlled substance. A 1995 conviction for assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury (§ 245) was alleged as a prison prior (§ 667.5, subd. (b)) and as a prior serious felony conviction under the Three Strikes law. (§§ 667, subds. (d) & (e)(1), 1170.12, subds. (b) & (c)(1).)

Haykel filed a motion to dismiss the strike allegation on the grounds assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury is not a serious felony under section 1192.7, subdivision (c). His motion was denied. The prosecution dismissed count 1, and Haykel submitted to a court trial on count 2 based on the police and laboratory reports and the record of his prior conviction. The trial court found him guilty as charged, and found the prison prior and strike allegations to be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.