McPhearson

McPhearson v. Michaels Co.

Good Law
117 Cal. Rptr. 2d 489·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 2383·2002 Daily Journal DAR 2549·96 Cal. App. 4th 843·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2115
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 4, 2002C034390California3,129 words

Opinion

Opinion

Scotland, J.

Rick McPhearson (plaintiff) appeals from an order disqualifying his attorney, John M. Riestenberg, from representing plaintiff in a discrimination and harassment action against plaintiff’s employer, The Michaels Company (defendant). Following the holding in Gilbert v. National Corp, for Housing Partnerships (1999) 71 Cal.App.4th 1240 [ 84 Cal.Rptr.2d 204 ] (hereafter Gilbert),, the trial court disqualified Riestenberg because of a perceived conflict of interest arising out of his representation of another employee who entered into a confidential settlement agreement with defendant.

In Gilbert , an attorney who successfully represented employees in a discrimination and harassment action brought against their employer was found to be disqualified from representing another employee in a similar case against the employer. ( Gilbert, supra, 71 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1243-1244.) Gilbert held that the settlement agreement reached in the first action, which required the parties “ ‘to keep the fact of this Settlement and this Agreement, and each of its terms, strictly confidential,’ ” and specified severe sanctions for breach of the confidentiality provision (id. at pp. 1245, 1252),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.