Arntz Builders v. City of Berkeley

Good Law
166 Cal. App. 4th 276·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 1352·82 Cal. Rptr. 3d 605·2008 WL 3893218
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 25, 2008A116078California6,336 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rivera, J.

As a general rule, a local governmental agency is entitled to receive written notice of a claim against it for money or damages prior to the filing of a legal action. The statutes governing this notice requirement include two types of claims procedures, one statutory (Gov. Code, §§ 905, 910) and one contractual (§ 930 et seq.). The question posed in this appeal is whether a claimant, having complied with a contractually mandated claims procedure, must also present a statutory claim prior to filing an action. In the published portion of this opinion, we conclude that the two procedures are intended to be parallel, not sequential; we therefore hold that if a claim is governed by a claims procedure prescribed by contract, the presentation of an additional, statutory claim pursuant to sections 905 and 910 is not required prior to filing a lawsuit unless it is expressly mandated by the contract.

In the unpublished portion of the opinion, we conclude that the public works contract entered into between Arntz Builders (Arntz) and the City of Berkeley (the City) did not require that Arntz present a section 910 claim before filing its action against the City. Accordingly, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.