Treo @ Kettner Homeowners Ass'n v. Superior Court

Good Law
166 Cal. App. 4th 1055·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 1420·83 Cal. Rptr. 3d 318
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 2008D052402California3,623 words

Opinion

Opinion

Benke, J.

Petitioner Treo @ Kettner Homeowners Association (Association), a homeowners association of a condominium project in downtown San Diego, sued real party in interest Intergulf Construction Corporation, developer of the project, and other real parties in interest (collectively Intergulf) for alleged construction defects. A provision of Association’s covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&R’s) required that all disputes between it and Intergulf be decided by a general judicial reference pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 638. Intergulf moved for an order submitting the case to a judicial referee. Association opposed the order, arguing that the provision of its CC&R’s cited by Intergulf was not a contract as required by section 638 or that if it was, it was unconscionable and unenforceable. The trial court granted Intergulf’s motion and ordered the matter to a general judicial reference. Association petitioned this court for a writ of mandate, directing the trial court to set aside that order. We issued an order to show cause.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Intergulf prepared and on January 12, 2001, recorded a declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.