People v. Johnson

Good Law
145 Cal. App. 4th 895·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1939·2006 Daily Journal DAR 16250·51 Cal. Rptr. 3d 893·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11399
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 14, 2006A112502California5,435 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bruiniers, J.

Appellant, pro se, was convicted by jury of indecent exposure. This offense was a felony by virtue of appellant having suffered prior convictions for the same offense. (Pen. Code, § 314, subd. 1. ) Additionally the jury found to be true the allegations that appellant had suffered two prior convictions (also for indecent exposure with a prior) resulting in separate prison terms. (§ 667.5, subd. (b).) Appellant was subsequently sentenced to a state prison term, consecutive to the sentence previously imposed in an unrelated matter, of two years eight months, including a year for each prior prison term, pursuant to section 667.5, subdivision (b). This appeal followed.

Appellant contends that: (1) the statute of limitations for the offense of which he was convicted had lapsed prior to initiation of proceedings against him, and (2) the finding as to one of the allegations under section 667.5, subdivision (b) must be stricken since he had not completed that prison term as of the time of trial.

We agree that one of the sentencing enhancement allegations must be stricken, and will modify appellant’s sentence accordingly. We otherwise affirm.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.