Garcia

People v. Garcia

Good Law
145 Cal. App. 4th 782·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1936·2006 Daily Journal DAR 16203·52 Cal. Rptr. 3d 70·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11377
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 14, 2006B187453California1,711 words

Opinion

Opinion

Yegan, J.

The celebrated case of Terry v. Ohio (1968) 392 U.S. 1 [ 20 L.Ed.2d 889 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 ], allows the police to perform a “patdown search” for weapons where there is reason to believe that the person is armed and dangerous. This rule cannot be “morphed” into a new rule to justify a search for ordinary evidence, here evidence of identification. We reverse. As we shall explain, nothing in either the letter or spirit of Terry v Ohio, supra, 392 U.S. 1 [ 20 L.Ed.2d 889 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 ] can be used as a springboard to justify a “patdown” search for identification.

Luis Acevedo Garcia appeals his conviction for, inter alia, possession of a controlled substance after his suppression motion was denied. This conviction stemmed from his encounter with Officer Smith of the Santa Paula Police Department on the evening of June 5, 2005. Appellant was riding a bicycle without an operative headlamp. Officer Smith lawfully detained him for violating Vehicle Code section 21201, subdivision (d). He asked appellant for identification. Appellant, who spoke limited English, said that he had no identification. On direct examination Officer Smith testified:

In the trial court, the sole…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.