Windham

People v. Windham

Good Law
145 Cal. App. 4th 881·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1938·51 Cal. Rptr. 3d 884·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11403
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 14, 2006A111600California4,431 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gemello, J.

Defendant was arrested for domestic violence against his girlfriend. While he was in jail, he placed several calls to her, which were recorded pursuant to an announced blanket policy of recording all outgoing telephone calls by jail inmates. The prosecutor obtained recordings of the calls for use in defendant’s criminal case, and the trial court denied a motion to suppress. We affirm, holding that defendant impliedly consented to the recording of his calls and the recordings are admissible under federal and state law.

Background

The following factual background was taken from the presentencing report. David Windham went shopping with his girlfriend, M.R., and asked her to loan him money. When she refused, he followed her out of the store, got into a car with her and started driving her around. In the car, he grabbed her purse and broke the strap. He then struck her in the neck and pulled a gold chain off her neck. He parked next to a cliff and told M.R. to get out of the car. She refused. He drove further, then stopped again and demanded she have sex with him. He threatened to beat her and abandon her by the road and said he would kill her if she reported him to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.