Guseinov

Guseinov v. Burns

Bad Law
145 Cal. App. 4th 944·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1941·2006 Daily Journal DAR 16261·51 Cal. Rptr. 3d 903·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11473
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 15, 2006B188984, B191645California7,357 words

Opinion

Opinion

Turner, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant, Stan Bums, appeals from a December 7, 2005 judgment and an April 13, 2006 amended judgment entered on an arbitration award in favor of plaintiff, Gary Guseinov. At issue is whether the arbitration award should have been vacated because the arbitrator failed to disclose he had served as an uncompensated mediator in another matter as part of a superior court program. In that matter, the arbitrator served as a pro bono mediator where plaintiff’s attorney represented a party who has nothing to do with this case. We find there is substantial evidence no ground for disqualification exists; hence, the arbitrator had no duty to disclose his prior service as an uncompensated mediator. As a result, the trial court did not err in refusing to vacate the arbitration award because the arbitrator failed to disclose his prior service as an unpaid mediator. We affirm the judgment.

H. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff filed this action against defendant on October 10, 2003. Plaintiff asserted contract breach and tort causes of action, among others, based on a May 19, 2003 settlement agreement arising out of a failed business relationship. The May 19, 2003 settlement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.