O'hanesian

O'hanesian v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.

Good Law
145 Cal. App. 4th 1305·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1993·2006 Daily Journal DAR 16509·52 Cal. Rptr. 3d 463·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11628
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 19, 2006E038114California4,170 words

Opinion

Opinion

HOLLENHORST, Acting P.J.

Plaintiff and appellant Charles Michael O'Hanesian appeals from an order of dismissal following the trial court's sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend as to plaintiffs complaint against defendants and respondents State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and State Farm General Insurance for declaratory relief, breach of contract, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The gravamen of plaintiffs complaint was that even though he obtained judgment in his underlying action against the tortfeasor, defendants unjustifiably refused to pay him the benefits to which he was entitled under the underinsured motorist provisions of the insurance policy defendants issued to him.

On appeal, plaintiff contends the trial court erred in sustaining the demurrer to his complaint without leave to amend. First, plaintiff contends, based on his interpretation of the insurance policy, statutes, and public policy, that defendants are bound by the judgment entered in the underlying action to the extent that the judgment determined liability and the amount of damages plaintiff sustained in the automobile accident. Second, plaintiff contends…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.