Hearst

Hearst v. Ganzi

Good Law
145 Cal. App. 4th 1195·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1989·2006 Daily Journal DAR 16487·52 Cal. Rptr. 3d 473·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11614
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 19, 2006B184659California6,094 words

Opinion

Opinion

Klein, J.

Plaintiffs and appellants William R. Hearst II (William), Deborah Hearst (Deborah) and Phoebe Hearst Cooke (Phoebe) (collectively, plaintiffs) appeal an order denying their petition to declare that an action they propose to bring against defendants and respondents Victor F. Ganzi, as cotrustee of the Hearst Family Trust, et al. (collectively, the Trustees), would not amount to a will contest. , ,

This appeal involves the latest challenge by certain beneficiaries of the Hearst Family Trust (the Trust) to the actions of the Trustees thereof. The plaintiffs, who are income beneficiaries of the Trust, contend the Trustees have breached their fiduciary duty of impartiality by favoring the remainder beneficiaries over the income beneficiaries. Plaintiffs propose to bring a petition against the Trustees for breach of fiduciary duty in order to compel the Trustees to increase the income distribution to them.

The first step in that process is the filing by plaintiffs of a petition under section 21320 to obtain a preliminary determination from the trial court as to whether their proposed petition against the Trustees, alleging a breach of fiduciary duty, would constitute a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.