Barton

Barton v. New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc.

Good Law
43 Cal. App. 4th 1200·51 Cal. Rptr. 2d 328
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 26, 1996A071127California3,347 words

Opinion

Opinion

We hold in this case that the statute of limitations for an action for wrongful discharge in violation of public policy is the one-year period provided by Code of Civil Procedure section 340, subdivision (3).

On October 5, 1994, plaintiff Mark Terrance Barton filed a complaint against defendant New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc., for breach of contract and an intentional tort, alleging wrongful termination. Defendant removed the action to federal court, on the ground plaintiff's claims were preempted by federal law because they could be resolved only by reference to the collective bargaining agreement between defendant and plaintiff's authorized bargaining representative. The federal district court dismissed with prejudice plaintiff's claims for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and intentional interference with a contractual relationship and prospective economic advantage. It remanded the only remaining claim, wrongful discharge in violation of public policy, to the superior court.

Plaintiff filed an amended complaint in superior court, alleging with more specificity that he was terminated in violation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.