Toplitzky

People v. Toplitzky

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 222·43 Cal. App. 4th 491·51 Cal. Rptr. 2d 41·96 Daily Journal DAR 2885·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1735
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 11, 1996B077637California1,114 words

Opinion

Opinion

Turner, J.

I. Introduction

This case involves a conspiracy among two lawyers and numerous non-attorneys to defraud insurance companies by staging automobile accidents. Myron Jay Toplitzky, defendant, appeals from a judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, of conspiracy (Pen. Code, § 182, subd. 1, now § 182, subd. (a)(1), Stats. 1989, ch. 897, § 15, p. 3062) to commit: insurance fraud and grand theft (count 1) (§ 487, subd. 1 (now § 487, subd. (a), Stats. 1993, ch. 1125; former Ins. Code §§ 556, 1871.1, see now § 550, added by Stats. 1992, ch. 675 and attorney capping (count 2). (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6152, subd. (a).) Defendant, an attorney, was sentenced to state prison to serve concurrent terms of five years (count 1) and three years (count 2). He was also ordered to pay a $25,000 fine. We affirm the judgment.

II. Discussion

A. Defendant’s Sentence for Conspiring to Commit Insurance Fraud and Grand Theft Did Not Violate the State and Federal Constitutional Prohibitions of Ex Post Facto Law

Defendant argues his sentence for conspiring to commit insurance fraud and grand theft violated the state and federal constitutional prohibitions of ex post facto laws. (Cal. Const., art.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.