In Re Larissa G.

Good Law
43 Cal. App. 4th 505·51 Cal. Rptr. 2d 16
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 7, 1996Docket Nos. D024180, D024517California3,367 words

Opinion

Opinion

California Indian Legal Services, James E. Cohen and Nancy S. Rank, for Intervener and Respondent.

Christopher Blake, upon the request of the Court of Appeal, for Minors.

[Opinion certified for partial publication. [1] ]

OPINION

KREMER, P.J. —

In this dependency case, Gina L. appeals the juvenile court's six-month review order suspending her visits with her minor children Larissa and Michael G. and its subsequent order transferring jurisdiction to the Navajo Nation (Nation) pursuant to the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) ( 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.). [2] As to the first order, Gina contends there was insufficient evidence that continuing visitation would be detrimental to the children, the court improperly vested discretion regarding resumption of visits in the department of social services (DSS) and a therapist, and the court erroneously required her to participate in a substance abuse program and testing. We agree there was insufficient evidence to support the suspension of visits and reverse and remand for a hearing on this issue. As to the second order, Gina contends her objection and good cause precluded the transfer of jurisdiction, the court erred in ordering the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.