European Beverage, Inc. v. Superior Court

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 271·43 Cal. App. 4th 1211·51 Cal. Rptr. 2d 147·96 Daily Journal DAR 3433·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2048
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 25, 1996B098022California1,338 words

Opinion

Opinion

Epstein, J.

In this case we hold that, in a court trial, absent a waiver or a stipulation to the contrary, a party is entitled to have the same judge try all portions of a bifurcated trial that depend on weighing evidence and issues of credibility, and that if that judge is unavailable to do so, a mistrial must be declared.

Factual and Procedural Summary

Sam Meara (real party in interest) brought this action claiming he owned a one-half interest in European Beverage, Inc., and that various defendants (petitioners) committed intentional torts by diluting his interest in European Beverage and diluting its assets. The matter proceeded to trial on June 27, 1994, before Judge Thomas Schneider. The court bifurcated the issues, ordering that the equitable issues of accounting and constructive trust be tried first in a court trial. At the conclusion of this first phase of trial, Judge Schneider determined that real party is the owner of 50 percent of the shares of the corporation, and directed a special master to conduct an accounting of the net worth of the corporation and inquire into any diversion of assets to petitioners.

The special master issued his report in November 1994. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.