Brown

People v. Brown

Bad Law
1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 1223·20 Cal. App. 4th 1251·25 Cal. Rptr. 2d 76·93 Daily Journal DAR 15495·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9042
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 7, 1993B072240California1,822 words

Opinion

Opinion

Woods, J.

A jury convicted appellant of making “terrorist threats” (Pen. Code, § 422; counts 5 and 6), intimidating witnesses (§ 136.1, subd. (c)(1); counts 7 and 8), being a felon in possession of a firearm (§ 12021, subd. (a); counts 9 and 10) and found true firearm use (§ 12022.5; counts 5, 6, 7, and 8) and prior felony conviction allegations (§§ 667.5, subd. (b) and 667, subd. (a)). Appellant was sentenced to a 15-year, 8-month state prison term.

Appellant contends: (1) section 422 prohibits only unconditional threats and therefore he did not violate it and (2) he is entitled to additional custody credits.

We conclude both contentions are correct and accordingly reverse the section 422 convictions, correct the abstract of judgment regarding custody credits but otherwise affirm the convictions and judgment.

Factual Background

Since the only dispute is the meaning of a statute, the facts may be stated simply. Our perspective favors the judgment. (People v. Barnes (1986) 42 Cal.3d 284, 303-304 [ 228 Cal.Rptr. 228 , 721 P.2d 110 ].)

Gloria Ortega, who came to the United States from Guatemala, and Nora Moya, who came to the United States from Mexico, were friends and neighbors.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.