Kizer

Kizer v. Hirata

Good Law
1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 1215·20 Cal. App. 4th 841·25 Cal. Rptr. 2d 19·93 Daily Journal DAR 15225·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8940
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 4, 1993B070280California1,069 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gates, J.

Plaintiff Department of Health Services, through its director, appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendants Nathaniel J. Friedman and Nathaniel J. Friedman, Inc. (referred to collectively as respondent) after the trial court granted a motion in limine for nonsuit. It contends: “Reviewing the entire statutory scheme of Welfare and Institutions Code § 14124.70 et seq. establishes that appellant, the Director of the Department of Health Services, is not required to prove Dr. Ishihama’s (the tortfeasor’s) liability under California medical malpractice law to enforce its lien for Medi-Cal benefits provided respondent against the settlement money respondent recovered.”

The determinative facts are uncontroverted. On November 28, 1983, respondent filed a medical malpractice action on behalf of Fuzi Hirata, who is now deceased. The suit, which was directed against Dr. Masao Ishihama, settled on August 29, 1986, for $100,000 and a check in that amount was made payable to Hirata and respondent. In the written settlement agreement Hirata executed, she acknowledged that she had “received medical care, services and supplies in connection with and arising out of the incident…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.