Teamer

People v. Teamer

Good Law
1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 1237·20 Cal. App. 4th 1454·25 Cal. Rptr. 2d 296·93 Daily Journal DAR 15755·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9211
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 13, 1993B072462California3,101 words

Opinion

Opinion

Vogel, J.

Bernard Teamer contends his conviction of vehicular burglary must be reversed because the only felony he intended to commit when he broke into a car was the theft of the car he broke into. We disagree, and therefore affirm his conviction.

Facts

At about 8:30 p.m. one evening, Valencia Oldham parked her red Nissan in front of her house, locked the car, went into her house and ultimately went to bed. At about 2 a.m. the next morning, Ken Oldham (Valencia Oldham’s nephew who was spending the night with his aunt) was awakened by noises coming from the street. When he looked out the window he saw a man in his aunt’s Nissan. As Ken Oldham watched, the man got out of the Nissan, walked to a black Hyundai parked on the other side of the street (facing in the wrong direction), and then returned to the Nissan with another man. Both men got into the Nissan.

At that point, Ken Oldham awakened his aunt. After grumbling that she didn’t want to be bothered because she had to get up early to go to work, Valencia Oldham finally got up, looked out and saw someone sitting in her car. She called the police. Deputy Sheriff Ellen D. Horton arrived within minutes and stopped her patrol car…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.