Dixon

People v. Dixon

Good Law
20 Cal. App. 4th 1029·25 Cal. Rptr. 2d 208
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 6, 1993Docket Nos. E011268, E011360California3,170 words

Opinion

Opinion

Dabney, J.

Defendants Joseph Lee Burns, Jr., and Samuel Dixon were charged in an information in counts 1 and 2 with robbery (Pen. Code, § 211), in count 4 with the murder of Eric Howard (§ 187), and in count 5 with the murder of Ronnie Newt (§ 187). Dixon was also charged in count 3 with assault with a deadly weapon (§ 245). The information specially alleged as to counts 1 and 2 that Burns had used a firearm in committing the crimes (§ 12022.5) and that a principal had been armed with a firearm during the commission of the crimes (§ 12022, subd. (a)). The information specially alleged as to counts 1, 2, and 3 that Dixon had personally used a firearm in committing the crimes (§ 12022.5) and as to count 3 that Dixon had inflicted great bodily injury (§ 12022.7).

The trial court granted severance of the trials of Burns and Dixon. Burns was tried by a jury; Dixon waived his right to a jury trial and was tried by the court. Following the People’s case-in-chief at each trial, the court granted the motions of Dixon (under § 1118) and Burns (under § 1118.1) to dismiss count 4 (the murder of Howard).

The jury found Bums guilty of the first degree murder of Newt and of both counts of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.