Albion River Watershed Protection Ass'n v. Department of Forestry & Fire Protection

Good Law
1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 1144·20 Cal. App. 4th 34·24 Cal. Rptr. 2d 341·93 Daily Journal DAR 14467·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8443
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 15, 1993A061063California998 words

Opinion

Opinion

Peterson, J.

Albion River Watershed Protection Association and Friends of Salmon Creek (Albion) appeal from a judgment dismissing their petition for writ of mandate. The petition had challenged the approval of a timber harvest plan (THP) by respondent California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Forestry). The trial court dismissed the petition, ruling Albion had failed to request a hearing within 90 days of filing as required by Public Resources Code section 21167.4 (section 21167.4). Albion now contends that section 21167.4 is inapplicable to judicial review of THP’s. We will reject this argument under the authority of our recent decision in Dakin v. Department of Forestry & Fire Protection (1993) 17 Cal.App.4th 681 [ 21 Cal.Rptr.2d 490 ]. However, as in that case, we will reverse the judgment of dismissal because the Dakin rule operates prospectively.

We will also reverse an order imposing sanctions against Albion. While sanctions may ultimately be appropriate, we deem it necessary to remand this case so the trial court can consider the issue further.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

II. Discussion

A. Applicability of Section 21167.4*

B. Sanctions

The trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.