People v. Gonzales

Good Law
1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 1264·20 Cal. App. 4th 1607·25 Cal. Rptr. 2d 305·93 Daily Journal DAR 16050·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9357
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 14, 1993D017481California1,014 words

Opinion

Opinion

Todd, J.

A jury convicted Fredrico Yanez Gonzales of two counts of residential burglary. (Pen. Code, §§ 459/460.) Gonzales subsequently admitted the truth of allegations concerning two serious prior felony convictions (§§ 667, subd. (a), 1192.7, subd. (c)(8)), as well as those concerning three prior prison terms (§ 667.5, subd. (b)), alleged in the amended information. The trial court then found true allegations concerning another serious prior felony conviction and another prior prison term. The trial court sentenced Gonzales to a total of twenty years in prison, imposing the upper term of six years for each of the residential burglary convictions to be served concurrently and, imposing two consecutive five-year enhancements for two serious prior felony convictions and four consecutive one-year enhancements for each of Gonzales’s prior prison terms. Gonzales appeals, contending (1) two of the one-year enhancements for prior prison terms were imposed in violation of section 654 and must be stricken, (2) impeaching testimony by a detective was improperly admitted under Evidence Code section 1235, and (3) failure of a victim-witness to confirm her pretrial identification requires…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.