Smith v. County of Kern

Good Law
1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 1269·20 Cal. App. 4th 1826·25 Cal. Rptr. 2d 716·93 Daily Journal DAR 16073·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9395
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 17, 1993F018129California3,036 words

Opinion

Opinion

Vartabedian, J.

Plaintiff and appellant Carl Wayne Smith appeals from a judgment entered after a demurrer to his first amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend. His action is based on his claim that, through its operation of Kern Medical Center, respondent Kern County negligently performed a laboratory test for acquired immuno-deficiency syndrome (AIDS), and that he was damaged by that negligence. On appeal, appellant contends he adequately alleged a cause of action against respondent, or, alternatively, he could amend the complaint to do so. We agree with the latter contention and reverse the judgment.

Factual and Procedural Summary

Our factual statement summarizes the allegations contained in the first amended complaint.

On May 16, 1991, appellant was employed as a Bakersfield police officer. In the discharge of his duties, he assisted a man suffering from self-inflicted stab wounds. The man was bloody, and appellant became covered with the man’s blood.

The man, identified only as John Doe, was taken to Kern Medical Center. He was committed for psychiatric evaluation pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 5150. Doe told other police officers he had tried to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.