Golden Eagle Insurance v. Foremost Insurance

Good Law
1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 1232·20 Cal. App. 4th 1372·25 Cal. Rptr. 2d 242·93 Daily Journal DAR 15652·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9159
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 9, 1993B067000California9,092 words

Opinion

Opinion

Johnson, J.

Following settlement of a lawsuit against its insureds, Anton and Cynthia Berkovich, Golden Eagle Insurance Company initiated this action against the Berkoviches and Foremost Insurance Company for equitable contribution and subrogation. The Berkoviches filed a cross-complaint seeking reimbursement from Foremost for the amount they contributed to the settlement of the underlying suit and reimbursement for attorney fees from Foremost and Golden Eagle. The matter was tried to the court, which entered a judgment denying the claims of all parties. For the reasons explained below, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

Facts and Proceedings Below

A. The Underlying Litigation

In July 1986 the Berkoviches purchased a mobilehome park from the Williamsons. In February 1989 the Berkoviches and the Williamsons were sued by 160 tenants seeking damages arising out of alleged improper maintenance of the facilities and grounds at the park. The complaint alleged the defendants’ neglect occurred continuously during the previous four years and was continuing.

The Williamsons tendered defense of the action to Foremost and the Berkoviches tendered defense to Foremost and Golden Eagle.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.