Lucio

Lucio v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
169 Cal. App. 4th 793·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 2460·86 Cal. Rptr. 3d 833
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 23, 2008B201511California3,019 words

Opinion

Opinion

Klein, J.

Plaintiff and appellant Jerry Lucio (Lucio), a former Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD or Department) officer, appeals a judgment denying his petition for writ of administrative mandate. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5.) In the petition, which named defendants and respondents City of Los Angeles (the City) and William Bratton, Chief of Police (Chief Bratton) (collectively, the City), Lucio sought to overturn an administrative decision terminating his employment as an LAPD officer.

One year and 13 days after discovering Lucio’s misconduct, the Department filed a personnel complaint with the Los Angeles Police Commission. The essential issue presented is whether certain aspects of the City’s disciplinary action against Lucio, namely, counts one, two and three, were barred by the one-year limitations period of Los Angeles City Charter (Charter) section 1070(c).

We conclude the City satisfied the one-year limitations provisions of Charter section 1070(c) because the matter was tolled for well in excess of 13 days, while the Department conducted a months-long internal criminal investigation into Lucio’s conduct. (Charter, § 1070(c)(1).)

We further conclude that although count…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.