Food Pro International, Inc. v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

Good Law
169 Cal. App. 4th 976·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 2475·89 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 30, 2008H031178California7,710 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mihara, J.

An injured construction worker brought a tort action against appellant Food Pro International, Inc. (Food Pro), relating to an injury at a food processing plant. Food Pro tendered defense of both the worker’s action and a related action to its insurance carrier, respondent Farmers Insurance Exchange (Farmers). Farmers denied coverage, and this action against Farmers for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing followed. The trial court entered judgment for Farmers following a court trial on Farmers’s duty to defend. On appeal, Food Pro contends the trial court erred in finding that Farmers did not have a duty to defend Food Pro pursuant to a commercial general liability (CGL) insurance policy. Food Pro also appeals from the trial court’s earlier summary adjudication of Food Pro’s claim for punitive damages. We find no merit to Food Pro’s punitive damages argument, but conclude that the trial court erred in finding that Farmers had no duty to defend Food Pro. We therefore reverse the judgment.

I. Background

A. Factual Background

Food Pro is a consulting firm that prepares and implements “plans for food processing and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.