Moghadam

Moghadam v. Regents of the University of California

Good Law
169 Cal. App. 4th 466·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 2439·86 Cal. Rptr. 3d 739
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 19, 2008B194314, B196120California6,919 words

Opinion

Opinion

Suzukawa, J.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff and appellant Rafi Moghadam (plaintiff) brought the present action against the Regents of the University of California (Regents) and nine of its officers and employees (collectively, defendants) for alleged violations of the Information Practices Act of 1977, Civil Code section 1798 et seq. (IPA or Act). The IPA is a privacy statute that, among other things, limits the kinds of personal information that public agencies may maintain, requires agencies to maintain personal information “with accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and completeness,” and permits individuals to inspect and request correction of agency-maintained personal information. (§ 1798.18.)

The core of plaintiff’s claim is that defendants refused to allow him to inspect and obtain copies of some of his midterm and final exams. Among his many other claims, he also alleges that defendants destroyed some of his exams after he asked to inspect them, maintained inaccurate and irrelevant information in his university records, failed to designate an IPA compliance officer, failed to properly safeguard the privacy of student exams, and failed to promulgate appropriate directives to ensure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.