In Re RC

Good Law
169 Cal. App. 4th 486·86 Cal. Rptr. 3d 776
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 19, 2008D052698California3,303 words

Opinion

Opinion

Susan Bookout, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Minor.

Patricia C. appeals a juvenile court judgment terminating her parental rights to her minor son R.C. under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. [1] Patricia contends the court erred by summarily denying her section 388 petition for modification seeking further reunification services or placement of R.C. with her. She also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the court's findings R.C. is adoptable and the beneficial parent-child relationship exception of section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(i) does not apply to preclude terminating parental rights. We affirm the judgment.

In April 2007 one-month-old R.C. became a dependent of the juvenile court under section 300, subdivision (b) and was removed from parental custody based on findings Patricia used heroin while pregnant with R.C., and he was experiencing symptoms of drug exposure. The court placed R.C. in foster care and ordered reunification services for Patricia, including individual therapy, parenting education, substance abuse treatment and a psychological evaluation. The court also ordered Patricia to participate in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.