Moreno

Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. Moreno

Good Law
174 Cal. App. 4th 546·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 848·94 Cal. Rptr. 3d 544·9 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6618
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 29, 2009B204902California7,344 words

Opinion

Opinion

In this case we consider whether an admittedly valid employment arbitration agreement that is governed by the Federal Arbitration Act ( 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.; FAA) may be enforced to dismiss a former employee's administrative wage claim against his former employer for unpaid vacation pay. The former employee, respondent Frank Moreno, filed an administrative wage claim with the Labor Commissioner according to the "Berman" process provided in Labor Code section 98 et seq. [1] (Added by Stats. 1976, ch. 1190, §§ 4-11, pp. 5368-5371.) Moreno's former employer, appellant Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. (Sonic), petitioned the superior court to dismiss the Berman proceeding and compel arbitration in accordance with the parties' arbitration agreement, which Moreno conceded was a valid agreement. The superior court denied the petition as premature. We reverse the order denying Sonic's motion to compel arbitration.

Sonic contends that the Labor Commissioner's jurisdiction over this statutory wage claim was divested by the FAA. Sonic cites as controlling authority the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Preston v. Ferrer (2008) 552 U.S. ___ [ 169 L.Ed.2d 917 , 128 S.Ct.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.