Hunt

People v. Hunt

Good Law
1999 Cal. App. LEXIS 814·74 Cal. App. 4th 939·88 Cal. Rptr. 2d 524·99 Daily Journal DAR 9351·99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7358
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 7, 1999C025177California3,238 words

Opinion

Opinion

Scotland, J.

Defendant Donald Gene Hunt was court-martialed for engaging in indecent acts with a child while stationed in Germany. Three years later, he was convicted of committing a lewd and lascivious act with a child under the age of 14 in California (Pen. Code, § 288, subd. (a)) and was sentenced to state prison.

Prior to his release, proceedings were initiated pursuant to the Sexually Violent Predators Act (the Act) (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.). The superior court found defendant to be a sexually violent predator and committed him to the Department of Mental Health for appropriate treatment and confinement.

On appeal, defendant contends his commitment must be reversed because his court-martial conviction in Germany for indecent acts with a child does not qualify as a conviction of a sexually violent offense within the meaning of the Act. We agree.

As we shall explain, to be committed pursuant to the Act, a person must have been convicted of a sexually violent offense against two or more persons. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600, subd. (a); further section references are to this code unless specified otherwise.) A “sexually violent offense” is defined in section 6600,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.