Bryant

People v. Bryant

Good Law
174 Cal. App. 4th 175·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 815·94 Cal. Rptr. 3d 151
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 22, 2009B205295California3,780 words

Opinion

Opinion

Turner, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant was committed to the state hospital pursuant to Penal Code section 1370, subdivision (a)(1)(B). On May 21, 2007, two psychiatrists, a psychologist, and a program assistant at Patton State Hospital signed a report prepared pursuant to section 1370, subdivision (b)(1). The report recommended defendant be returned to superior court as he was competent to stand trial. However, it was not until more than two months later on July 27, 2007, pursuant to section 1372, subdivision (a)(1), that the designee of the medical director at Patton State Hospital certified defendant was competent to stand trial. Normally, an accused is not entitled to section 4019 presentence conduct credits for time spent in the state mental hospital against a subsequent sentence. This is because the period of confinement while the accused is hospitalized is not considered punitive. Here, we discuss when defendant became entitled to conduct credits—on May 21, 2007, when the hospital staff unanimously reported he was competent to stand trial or later on July 27, 2007, when the section 1372, subdivision (a)(1) medical certification was mailed to the trial court. In light of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.