Taylor

People v. Taylor

Bad Law
174 Cal. App. 4th 920·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 896·94 Cal. Rptr. 3d 756
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 4, 2009E044368California5,502 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ramirez, J.

INTRODUCTION

Eric Wayne Taylor (Taylor), Robert Landis (Landis), Michael Badura (Badura), Steven Arthur Reynolds (Reynolds), and George Wright (Wright), collectively referred to as defendants, were convicted in separate criminal proceedings of various sexual offenses and were sentenced to state prison. Each was subsequently found to be a sexually violent predator (SVP) at the conclusion of his determinate sentence, and was subjected to civil commitments pursuant to the Sexually Violent Predator Act (SVPA; Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.), prior to November 2006.

Under the law as it existed at the time of defendants’ initial commitments, the civil commitment was for a two-year period, after which the People were required to petition to extend the commitment (or to recommit) for an additional two years, if, in the opinion of the State Department of Mental Health (DMH), the individual still met the criteria for an SVP.

On September 20, 2006, Senate Bill No. 1128 (2005-2006 Reg. Sess.) went into effect, changing the commitment term from two years to an indeterminate term. On November 7, 2006, Proposition 83, also known as Jessica’s Law, became law, further amending the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.