Sorenson

People v. Sorenson

Good Law
125 Cal. App. 4th 612·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 2267·2005 Daily Journal DAR 181·22 Cal. Rptr. 3d 854·2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 156
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 2005H026774California3,445 words

Opinion

Opinion

Walsh, J.

After his suppression motion was denied, a criminal defendant agreed to resolve the felony drunk driving charges against him by a plea that would result in a two-year prison sentence. The defendant said that he understood that among the additional consequences of his plea were: “You can be ordered to pay fines and fees totaling as much as 5,000 dollars.” “You can be ordered to contribute 10,000 dollars to the State Restitution Fund with a required minimum contribution of 200 dollars.” He asked for and received immediate sentencing.

The defendant did not object when the court orally imposed, in addition to the agreed prison term, a $1,000 state restitution fine pursuant to Penal Code section 1202.4 and a concurrent $500 fine “with the appropriate penalty assessment.” The resulting minute order calculated the penalty assessments to be $1,125 and also reflected an additional suspended restitution fine of $1,000 pursuant to section 1202.45. Here we will conclude that defendant was adequately advised of the potential fines and assessments to which a guilty plea would subject him and that, since they were not made part of the plea agreement, their imposition did not violate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.