Townsel

Townsel v. San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board

Good Law
1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 662·65 Cal. App. 4th 940·77 Cal. Rptr. 2d 231·98 Daily Journal DAR 8067·98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5826
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 27, 1998D026485California4,213 words

Opinion

Opinion

Howatt, J.

Plaintiff Rodric Townsel appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of mandate directing the San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board (MTDB) to vacate its decision to uphold the termination of his employment as a code enforcement officer. Townsel contends MTDB denied his constitutional right to due process by failing to provide him a posttermination evidentiary hearing. We agree and reverse.

Factual and Procedural Background

Townsel began working for MTDB as a code compliance inspector in 1989. It is undisputed that Townsel’s employment with MTDB could be terminated only for cause.

In 1993 Townsel was suspended for three weeks' and placed on probation for six months for violating a number of MTDB’s rules. Townsel filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in which he alleged, among other things, that MTDB improperly denied him a postdisciplinary evidentiary hearing. The federal court ruled that Townsel was not entitled to a postdisciplinary hearing and denied the petition, stating; “Townsel is not entitled to the procedural requirements established for civil service employees, because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.