Stevenson

Stevenson v. Baum

Good Law
1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 582·65 Cal. App. 4th 159·75 Cal. Rptr. 2d 904·98 Daily Journal DAR 7191·98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5126
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 29, 1998C026195California2,856 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sims, J.

Plaintiffs Ted and Alice Stevenson bought a mobile-home park from defendant James W. Baum under a contract which provided that “[tjitle is to be free of . . . easements . . . other than . . . [tjhose of record” and that Baum was to furnish a title policy “insuring title in Buyer subject only to . . . easements ... as set forth above.”

The title policy furnished to the Stevensons revealed the existence of a recorded easement for ingress and egress belonging to Standard Oil Company. It failed to mention that the easement was also for pipeline purposes, although this fact was clearly stated in the public records.

Long after the Stevensons bought the park, Standard Oil Company’s successor in interest notified them that they would have to remove several mobile homes which encroached on the easement and blocked access to the pipeline.

The Stevensons sued Baum for fraudulent misrepresentation and concealment. Baum moved for summary judgment, arguing among other things that he had misrepresented nothing and that the purchase contract relieved him of any duty to disclose the recorded easement. The trial court granted the motion and dismissed the complaint. We shall…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.