MISSION OAKS v. County of Santa Barbara

Caution
65 Cal. App. 4th 713·77 Cal. Rptr. 2d 1
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 18, 1998B108463, B111367California5,838 words

Opinion

Opinion

STEVEN J. STONE, Presiding Justice.

A developer is disgruntled with the findings of a draft environmental impact report (DEIR) prepared by the consultant the county hires to evaluate the developer's project proposal. The DEIR explains that unmitigable impacts would result if the project were developed. The developer hires its own consultant who prepares and submits a report to the county which states there are no such unmitigable impacts. In the final environmental impact report (FEIR), the county denies approval for the project due to the unmitigable impacts. The developer sues the county, the county's consultant and others over the denial of project approval. The trial court sustains defendants' demurrers and grants motions to strike the action and enters judgment in favor of the defendants.

Mission Oaks Ranch, Ltd. (Mission Oaks) appeals from the judgment in favor of the County of Santa Barbara (the County), Envicom Corporation (Envicom), Storrer Environmental Services (Storrer) and various individuals. [1] Because the action is untimely and administrative mandamus would have been the proper remedy to seek, we affirm. Furthermore, we affirm because the respondents owe no duty…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.