In Re EH

Good Law
108 Cal. App. 4th 659·133 Cal. Rptr. 2d 740
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 28, 2003B158662California4,874 words

Opinion

Opinion

Steven D. Schatz, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, Santa Ana, for Jeremy H.

Jesse F. Rodriguez, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, Marina Del Rey, for Tiffany M.

Janette Freeman Cochran, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, Pasadena, for E.H. and D.H.

MUÑOZ, J. [**]

The Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (Department) appeals an order finding that Tiffany M.'s infant daughter, E. H., was not described by Welfare and Institutions Code [1] section 300, subdivision (e), [2] because the identity of the person who caused her injuries (numerous broken bones) could not be established as required by the statute. The dependency court sustained allegations under section 300, subdivisions (a), (b), (j). On appeal, the Department argues that the language of subdivision (e) only requires that the identity of the person need be known where it is someone other than the child's parent who is the abuser. [3]

Tiffany is the mother of E., born in June 2001. On September 14, 2001, E. was taken to the doctor with a swollen right thigh. E. was hospitalized with multiple rib fractures, fractures of the wrist, femur, feet, hands, and hip. The fractures…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.