Nightlife Partners, Ltd. v. City of Beverly Hills

Good Law
108 Cal. App. 4th 81·133 Cal. Rptr. 2d 234·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 612·2003 Daily Journal DAR 4445·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3510
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 24, 2003B161436California6,824 words

Opinion

Opinion

Croskey, J.

The City of Beverly Hills (City) appeals from an order granting Nightlife Partners, Ltd.; Entertainment Associates of L.A., Inc.; Déjá Vu Showgirls of Beverly Hills, LLC and Déjá Vu Consulting, Inc. (collectively Petitioners), a new administrative hearing. There is substantial evidence to support the trial court’s determination that Petitioners are entitled to a new hearing, and we therefore affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

Petitioners operate a cabaret in City, pursuant to the adult entertainment regulatory permit (permit) required by City’s municipal code. At all times relevant to this appeal, Petitioners and City were engaged in federal litigation, Nightlife Partners, Ltd. v. City of Beverly Hills (U.S. Dist. Ct. case No. CV 98-10266 RAP), related to City’s regulation of adult entertainment. Assistant City Attorney Terence Boga (Boga) was one of the city attorneys litigating the federal lawsuit.

City’s municipal code required Petitioners to renew their permit every two years, and also required that a renewal application be submitted at least 30 days before the initial permit was to expire. In early 2001, Petitioners attempted to obtain from City an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.