GOLFLAND ENTERTAINMENT CENTERS, INC. v. Superior Court

Good Law
108 Cal. App. 4th 739·133 Cal. Rptr. 2d 828·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 713·2003 Daily Journal DAR 5119·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4024
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 13, 2003C043143California4,574 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sims, J.

In August 2000, when he was 10 years old, David Nunez almost died in an accident that occurred while he was riding a “bumper boat” on the premises of defendant and petitioner Golfland Entertainment Centers, Inc. David’s mother, Arlyn Nunez, individually and as guardian ad litem for David and his siblings, filed a lawsuit alleging personal, injury and emotional distress. Dale Baumbach, Ph.D., a neuropsychologist, concluded the boy suffered brain damage due to oxygen deprivation during the near-drowning. In the course of discovery, petitioner demanded that David submit to a mental examination by a neuropsychologist of its choosing, Randall Epperson, Ph.D. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2032.)

Because the parties could not agree on the ground rules for Dr. Epperson’s examination, petitioner filed a motion to compel compliance with its demand. Ultimately, on December 9, 2002, the trial court entered an order providing: (1) Dr. Epperson “may take a history from DAVID NUNEZ, but may not require or elicit narrative responses”; (2) “Plaintiffs’ counsel as well as [petitioner’s] counsel may attend the examination, but no third parties, including relatives, counsel or persons other than the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.