Park

Park v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RAILWAY CO.

Good Law
108 Cal. App. 4th 595·133 Cal. Rptr. 2d 757·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 696·2003 Daily Journal DAR 5040·33 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20199
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 9, 2003E029908California8,051 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hollenhorst, J.

Plaintiff Michael Park, an employee of Consolidated Waste Industries, Inc. (Consolidated), was seriously injured when a 55-gallon drum exploded. The drum contained used nickel iron batteries from defendant Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company (Burlington). Burlington had employed Consolidated, a hazardous waste disposal company, to dispose of the batteries. After a lengthy jury trial, the jury found against Burlington and awarded plaintiff Park $1,250,000 in economic damages and $500,000 in noneconomic damages.

Burlington appeals, contending the judgment violates California law as stated in Privette v. Superior Court (1993) 5 Cal.4th 689 [ 21 Cal.Rptr.2d 72 , 854 P.2d 721 ], Toland v. Sunland Housing Group, Inc. (1998) 18 Cal.4th 253 [ 74 Cal.Rptr.2d 878 , 955 P.2d 504 ], and related cases. Alternatively, it contends that the trial court erred in the admission of evidence, and the jury awarded damages that are not supported by substantial evidence.

We agree with Burlington’s first contention and reverse the judgment.

Facts

Consolidated is in the business of transporting hazardous waste to a disposal site. Plaintiff Park was employed by Consolidated as a truck…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.