Gaggero

Gaggero v. Yura

Good Law
108 Cal. App. 4th 884·134 Cal. Rptr. 2d 313·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 728·2003 Daily Journal DAR 5239·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4104
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 16, 2003B156171California4,021 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mosk, J.

Defendant and respondent Anna Marie Yura (Yura) obtained a summary judgment against plaintiff and appellant Stephen M. Gaggero (Gaggero). Gaggero alleged that Yura breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing by refusing to close a real property sales transaction. Gaggero requested, inter alia, specific performance of the real estate sales contract. The trial court held that as a matter of law Gaggero did not fulfill the requirement of being ready, willing and able to purchase the property. Seeking reversal of the summary judgment, Gaggero contends that he raised a triable issue of material fact and further argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for reconsideration. We hold that Yura did not meet her threshold burden on summary judgment with respect to the issue of Gaggero’s financial ability to purchase the property, and that Gaggero raised triable issues of material fact concerning his intent to purchase the property and the existence of an agreement to conditions, covenants, and restrictions to be placed on the property. We therefore reverse the summary judgment.

Factual and Procedural Background

Frederick Harris (Harris), through a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.