Tatum

People v. Tatum

Good Law
108 Cal. App. 4th 288·133 Cal. Rptr. 2d 267·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 629·2003 Daily Journal DAR 4700·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3697
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 29, 2003B155958California3,932 words

Opinion

Opinion

Armstrong, J.

Appellant Darryl Dorrell Tatum was convicted, following a jury trial, of one count of attempted murder in violation of Penal Code sections 187 and 664, one count of assault with a deadly weapon in violation of section 245, subdivision (a)(1) and one count of infliction of injury on a dependent elder in violation of section 368, subdivision (b)(1). The jury found that in the commission of all three offenses, appellant personally inflicted great bodily injury within the meaning of Penal Code section 12022.7, subdivisions (a) and (c) and personally used a deadly and dangerous weapon within the meaning of section 12022, subdivision (b)(1). The jury also found true the allegation that the victim suffered great bodily injury within the meaning of Penal Code section 368, subdivision (a)(2).

In the published portion of this opinion, we consider appellant’s contention that the trial court erred in admitting the videotaped statement of the deceased victim pursuant to the elder and dependent adults exception to the hearsay rule set forth in Evidence Code section 1380. In the unpublished portion of this opinion, we consider appellant’s claims that the trial court erred in failing to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.