Jacobs

Jacobs v. GROSSMONT HOSPITAL

Good Law
108 Cal. App. 4th 69·133 Cal. Rptr. 2d 9·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 608·2003 Daily Journal DAR 4351·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3479
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 24, 2003D039663California3,988 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aaron, J.

I.

Introduction

Plaintiff Fern Jacobs appeals a summary judgment in favor of defendant Grossmont Hospital on Jacobs’s complaint for professional negligence and premises liability. The action arose when Jacobs, following an unsuccessful suicide attempt, tripped and sustained injuries while at Grossmont Hospital during a 72-hour hold under Welfare and Institutions Code section 5150, which allows temporary detention of mentally disordered individuals who pose a danger either to themselves or to others, for treatment and evaluation. . The court granted summary judgment for Grossmont Hospital on the ground that the immunity of section 5278 applied to all civil tort liability related to an admission under a lawful section 5150 hold.

The issue before us is the scope of the immunity granted under section 5278 to “[individuals authorized ... to detain.” Jacobs maintains that the immunity applies only to the decision to detain a person for a 72-hour hold. /■Grossmont Hospital contends that if the decision to detain is lawful, that is, supported by probable cause, then the immunity applies to all evaluation and ' treatment that may occur during the detention, with the possible…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.