Palmer v. Schindler Elevator Corp.

Bad Law
108 Cal. App. 4th 154·133 Cal. Rptr. 2d 339
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 28, 2003B147480California1,439 words

Opinion

Opinion

Perluss, J.

Cindra L. Palmer suffered injuries when an elevator in which she was riding in a high-rise office building suddenly dropped several floors and came to an abrupt halt. She brought suit against the building owner, Equitable Real Estate and Investment Management, Inc. (Equitable), the building management company, Compass Management & Leasing, Inc. (Compass), and the elevator company, Schindler Elevator Corporation (Schindler). After a lengthy trial the jury awarded Palmer $5.75 million in economic and noneconomic damages. The defendants have appealed, contending the jury verdict was inconsistent and the trial court made prejudicial evidentiary errors. Palmer has cross-appealed, contending the trial court erred in refusing to award her enhanced costs pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 998 and prejudgment interest pursuant to Civil Code section 3291. We affirm the judgment in all respects.

Factual and Procedural Background *

Discussion

1-3.

4. The Trial Court Did Not Err in Finding Palmer Is Not Entitled to Enhanced Fees and Costs Under Code of Civil Procedure Section 998

In her cross-appeal Palmer contends the trial court erred in denying her motion for enhanced…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.