Jopson

Jopson v. FEATHER RIVER AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

Good Law
108 Cal. App. 4th 492·133 Cal. Rptr. 2d 506
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 2, 2003C041927California3,961 words

Opinion

Opinion

Raye, J.

Because of a miscalculation, the Feather River Air Quality Management District (the District) banked and issued the Jopson Ranch (Jopson) 470 tons of marketable pollution credits more than it actually had earned for reducing agricultural burning.

Section 818.8 of the Government Code (section 818.8) grants the government the following immunity: “A public entity is not liable for an injury caused by misrepresentation by an employee of the public entity, whether or not such misrepresentation be negligent or intentional.” The trial court concluded that the misrepresentation immunity provided by section 818.8 protected the District from any liability to Jopson arising from the miscalculation. The court therefore granted the District’s motion for summary adjudication. We affirm.

Facts

In California, the right to pollute the air can be bought and sold. Air quality management districts have created a valuable commodity, the emission reduction credit (ERC). The ERC is evidenced by transferable certificates approved, banked, and issued by the districts. Simply put, a polluter who pollutes less can sell the ERC to allow the purchaser to pollute more. Because open-air burning of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.