Mills

Mills v. Forestex Co.

Good Law
108 Cal. App. 4th 625·134 Cal. Rptr. 2d 273·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 709·2003 Daily Journal DAR 5078·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3966
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 14, 2003F039423California11,571 words

Opinion

Opinion

Buckley, J.

In 1990, Lori and Robert Mills (the Mills) hired Mike Wunder, doing business as Wunder Wood Construction (collectively Wunder), to build them a house in Jamestown in Tuolumne County. They hired him again the following year to build a garage, which would be connected to the house by a deck. The hardboard siding Wunder installed on both the house and the garage had been manufactured by the Stimson Lumber Company, doing business as Forestex Company (collectively Forestex).

Within a year or so after the buildings were completed, the siding started to warp and buckle. Despite Wunder’s early efforts to correct the problem, it grew progressively worse. By 1993 the paint on the siding had begun to peel, and nails started backing out the year after that. The Mills finally contacted Forestex in 1996. Forestex inspected the house and told them the siding had been installed improperly.

The Mills initiated the present action in 2000 by filing a complaint for damages against Wunder and Forestex alleging violation of the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (Civ. Code, § 1790 et seq.), breach of express warranty, breach of implied warranty, and strict products liability. Eventually,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.