Henry

Henry v. Home Insurance

Good Law
907 F. Supp. 1392·1995 WL 727811·1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18154
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 1995CV 94-4155 AWTCalifornia3,071 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tashima, J.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an action to recover benefits under a plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Defendant The Home Insurance Company (“Home”), has moved for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, Home’s motion will be denied and the action remanded for reevaluation of Henry’s claim in a manner consistent with this opinion.

BACKGROUND

During the time frame of the underlying events, Henry was an associate attorney with the law firm of LeBoeuf Lamb Leiby & MacRae (“LeBoeuf”), in Los Angeles. Henry was insured under an Accidental Death & Dismemberment Plan (the “Plan”) maintained by his employer, and insured by Home. The Plan is an ERISA plan.

In March or April, 1993, Henry, then aged 31, alleges that he fell down a stairway in LeBoeuf s parking garage, hitting the back of his head hard enough to see stars. Henry claims he had a large bruise and bump on the back of his head, and experienced neck and back pains for several months after the fall. He did not report the incident because, at the time, he did not believe he had suffered any major injury.

On July 30, 1993, Henry noticed a distortion of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.