Jenkins

People v. Jenkins

Good Law
143 Cal. App. 4th 369·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1485·2006 Daily Journal DAR 13005·48 Cal. Rptr. 3d 904·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9101
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 2006C049573California5,374 words

Opinion

Opinion

CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION. [*]

BLEASE, Acting P.J.

Defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction after a jury found him guilty as charged of two counts of battery with serious bodily injury (Pen.Code, § 243, subd. (d); counts 1 and 3) [1] and two counts of assault with a deadly weapon upon the victims Seeva and Steven Cherms. (§ 245, subd. (a)(1); counts 2 and 4.) The jury found true the great bodily injury enhancements alleged in connection with the aggravated assault charges (§ 12022.7, subd. (a)) and the criminal street gang enhancement alleged as to all four counts. (§ 186.22, subd. (b)(1).) The court sentenced defendant to a total unstayed prison term of 22 years and four months. It made count four, the aggravated assault on Steven Cherms, the principal term, imposed a consecutive term on count two for the aggravated assault on Seeva Cherms, and imposed concurrent terms on counts one and three for felony battery. The court stayed the sentence on count three but did not stay the sentence on count one.

On appeal, defendant contends the judgment must be reversed because the trial court committed prejudicial error by denying his motion to bifurcate trial of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.