Lee v. Blue Shield of California

Good Law
154 Cal. App. 4th 1369·2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 1486·65 Cal. Rptr. 3d 612
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 7, 2007B190441California2,950 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rothschild, J.

Dr. Thomas T. Lee sued Blue Shield of California alleging that Blue Shield wrongfully suspended him from its network of medical providers for alleged medical incompetency, unlawfully denied him an administrative hearing on the issue of his competency and then illegally terminated his provider contract based on his alleged failure to cooperate in the administrative process. Lee seeks damages and declaratory relief but not reinstatement as a provider. The trial court sustained Blue Shield’s demurrer without leave to amend on the ground that Lee had not exhausted his administrative remedies. Lee filed a timely appeal from the judgment dismissing his action.

The trial court correctly sustained Blue Shield’s demurrer to Lee’s contract and tort causes of action. Exhaustion of the administrative remedy under Business and Professions Code sections 809 through 809.9 (commonly referred to as an “809 hearing”) is a prerequisite to Lee’s recovery of damages for wrongful suspension and termination as a Blue Shield physician, and Lee admits he has not exhausted that remedy. The trial court erred, however, in sustaining the demurrer to Lee’s cause of action for declaratory relief.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.