Compania Engraw Commercial E. Industrial S.A. v. Schenley Distillers Corporation. Schenley Distillers Corporation v. Compania Engraw Commercial E. Industrial S.A

181 F.2d 876 COMPANIA ENGRAW COMMERCIAL E. INDUSTRIAL S.A. v. SCHENLEY DISTILLERS CORPORATION. SCHENLEY DISTILLERS CORPORATION v. COMPANIA ENGRAW COMMERCIAL E. INDUSTRIAL S.A. No. 12261. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. May 3, 1950. Stanton & Stanton, Los Angeles, Cal. (Mesirov & Leonards, Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for appellant Compania Engraw. Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon, Edgar H. Rowe, San Francisco, Cal.) for appellant Schenley Distillers Corporation. Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, BONE, Circuit Judge, and GOODMAN, District judge GOODMAN, District Judge. Upon this appeal, both the seller Engraw (of Argentina) and the buyer Schenley (of the United States) have appealed from a judgment awarding Engraw damages in the sum of $5,845.25 for the breach of an alleged contract for the sale f.o.b. Buenos Aires, Argentina, of 1135 tons of glucose, deliveries to be made in installment from June to December 1946. Schenley, the alleged buyer, contends that there was no contract between the parties. Engraw contends that there was a contract but that the lower court failed to award adequate damages for the breach. Upon the basis of various written communications…