People v. Bradford

Good Law
154 Cal. App. 4th 1390·2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 1483·65 Cal. Rptr. 3d 548
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 7, 2007D046614California11,002 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aaron, J.

I.

INTRODUCTION

Defendant Matthew Ray Bradford appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence. A jury found Bradford guilty of second degree murder, and found true the special allegations that he personally used a firearm, personally and intentionally discharged a firearm, and personally and intentionally used and discharged a firearm causing great bodily injury or death. The trial court sentenced Bradford to an aggregate term of 40 years to life.

On appeal, Bradford raises 10 claims challenging the judgment of conviction and sentence. Bradford contends that (1) the trial court erred in instructing the jury on the element of malice required for second degree murder, and in particular, that the court’s supplemental instructions were not balanced because they did not include a reminder that the prosecution bears the burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the absence of provocation and/or imperfect self-defense; (2) the trial court impermissibly intruded on the jury’s deliberative process by interacting with the jury; (3) the trial court’s unrecorded interactions with the jury left Bradford with an inadequate record on appeal, thereby preventing him from receiving…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.