In Re Cooper

Good Law
153 Cal. App. 4th 1043·62 Cal. Rptr. 3d 907
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 27, 2007A116437California2,807 words

Opinion

Opinion

On February 16, 2006, the Board of Prison Terms (Board) found Peter George Cooper suitable for release on parole. Cooper was serving an indeterminate prison term of 16 years to life for his conviction of second degree murder with use of a deadly weapon (Pen.Code, §§ 187, 12022, subdivision (b)). He entered prison on July 16, 1987, and his minimum eligible parole date was July 24, 2001. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger reversed the Board's grant of parole, finding that the commitment offense was particularly heinous, leading him to conclude that Cooper's present release posed an unreasonable public safety risk.

Cooper filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in this court, requesting that we reinstate the Board's grant of parole. We issued an order to show cause, and appointed counsel for Cooper. We conclude that some evidence did not support the Governor's decision to reverse the Board's grant of parole. (See, e.g., In re Rosenkrantz (2002) 29 Cal.4th 616, 677 , 128 Cal. Rptr.2d 104 , 59 P.3d 174 ( Rosenkrantz) . ) Additionally, the Attorney General concedes that it cannot specify what documents were actually reviewed by the Governor. This admission raises serious…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.